立ち入り検査
昨日、探偵業法に基づく立ち入りがあった。探偵業法は、平成19年6月1日に施行され早や３年目を迎えた。
業法は議員立法により作られたもので、２０条からなる割りに簡潔な法律である。目的は消費者、
被調査人の保護を目的としたもので業者の育成などは眼中に無く、依頼者との契約事項を細かく規定し、
業を営もうとするものは所轄の公安委員会に届出をし、何処の誰がどんな名称で営んでいるのかを登録。また、
業者は従業員名簿や契約書の備え付け、守秘義務に関する規定や個人情報保護法の遵守など細かく規定されており、
13条で、公安委員会は、この法律の施行に必要な限度において、探偵業者に対し、
その業務の状況に関し報告若しくは資料の提出を求め、又は警察職員に探偵業者の営業所に立ち入り、業務の状況若しくは帳簿、
書類その他の物件を検査させ、関係者に質問させることができる。となっている。
その法に基づき、昨日初めて警察の立ち入り検査なるものが弊社にあった。備え付け義務のあるものや守秘義務、
個人情報保護規定などはキチッと整えており、何らビクつくこともないが、何となく警察の立ち入りとなると気持ちの良いものではない。
朝十時の約束で、準備万端、緊張の面持ちで待っていると、9時50分に事務員からな、、「社長・・
警察の方がこられましたので６階に上がって頂きました」との内線電話。
直ぐに6階でお待ちしていると、顔見知りの係官と初めてお会いする所轄の係官とが２人、ニコリともせずお早うとも云わず、
如何にも役所の人らしい無愛想さで来社の趣旨を告げ、身分証明を提示し席についた。で、指示されるままに書類を提出し、２・
３の質問に応答し、事務所を案内し、僅か３０分程で立ち入り検査は終了した。何となくあっ気ない感じ。
もう少し業界に関する多方面質問があるかと思ったが、何もなし。業界の市況や動向を聞くでもなく、ただ杓子定規に言いたい事を云い、
聞きたいことを聞くだけで味も素っ気もないものであった。これが本来の立ち入りの姿なのでしょうが、「官庁とはこんなものだ」、
と従来の認識をただ単に重ねただけの味気ないものであった。
Yesterday, there was a raid under the Detective Work Act. The Detective Business Law came into effect on June 1, 2007, and is now in its third year.
The Business Law was drafted by the legislators and consists of 20 articles, yet it is concise. The goal is the consumer.
The purpose of this document is to protect the subject of the investigation, and it does not aim at training of contractors, but it stipulates in detail the terms of the contract with the client.
Those who intend to engage in the business must report to the local public safety commission and register who is engaged in the business and under what name. Also.
Vendors are required to have a list of employees and contracts in place, as well as detailed regulations regarding confidentiality and compliance with privacy laws.
Article 13 provides that the Public Safety Commission may, to the extent necessary for the enforcement of this Act, require a detective agency to
(2) To request reports or materials concerning the status of the detective agency’s business, or to have police personnel enter the business office of the detective agency, or to request reports or materials concerning the status of the detective agency’s business.
Have documents and other property inspected, and may have the person concerned questioned. In addition, it is also possible to use the same amount of data for the same purpose.
In accordance with the law, we were subjected to a police inspection for the first time yesterday. What is required to be provided, confidentiality,
There is nothing to be alarmed about as the regulations for the protection of personal information are in place, but I don’t feel comfortable when the police enter the building.
After waiting for the appointment at 10:00 a.m. with a look of nervousness, the clerk said at 9:50 a.m., “Mr. President…
The police have come to the 6th floor,” the extension said.
When I was waiting for them on the sixth floor, two officers, one a familiar face and the other a local officer I’d never met before, didn’t smile or say good morning.
I told him the purpose of coming to the company with the brusque manner of a government official, presented my identification and took a seat. Then, submit the documents as instructed, and 2.
I responded to question #3, showed him around the office, and after only about 30 minutes, the on-site inspection was over. It’s kind of unassuming.
I thought there would be a few more multi-faceted questions about the industry, but there were none. They don’t listen to market conditions or trends in the industry, they just say what they want to say by the book.
It was a tasteless, bare-bones affair that only asked what he wanted to hear. This is the way it should be, but it’s like saying, “This is what government offices are like.
It was just a tasteless superimposition of the conventional perceptions of “I don’t know what to do.
