持論、採用調査・雇用調査・人事調査
５月２６日の新聞報道によると、「大阪府警の警部補が飲食店に盗みに入ろうとしている所を店員に発見され、
持っていた金きりばさみで切りつけ怪我をさせた」と云う、とんでもない事件があったようだ。
ただ、「警察官が泥棒をするなどあってはならないことであるが、警察官も生身の人間である。
ある意味し方がない」ところが「泥棒が警察官に成るような事があってはならない」
と云うのが私の持論である。持論も何も小学生でも判る当たり前のことである。
でも、泥棒であるか否かの見極めは中々難しい。
漫画に出てくる泥棒のように頭からほう被りして抜き足差し足で何時も歩いていればいいが、実際にはそうは上手く行かない。
そこで、警察官の採用に際しては、窃盗などの犯罪歴が有るか否かを徹底して調べ採否の判断材料の一つにしている。
そうした事は警察官に限らずで、民間企業でも社員として相応しいか否かは、あらゆる角度から精査し判断すべきである。
ところが、厚生労働省（ハローワーク）や多くの人権団体は、泥棒で有るか否か、
会社にとって相応しい人であるか否かを調べてはいけないと云う。何故なら「差別につながるおそれが有るから」と。
私にはこの理論がどうしても理解できない。
According to a newspaper report on May 26, “A lieutenant of the Osaka Prefectural Police was found by a clerk trying to steal from a restaurant, and he was arrested.
It seems that there was an outrageous incident in which a man cut himself with a pair of gold scissors he had been carrying and injured himself.
However, he said, “Police officers should not be thieves, but they are also flesh and blood people.
The “no way” part is that there should be no such thing as a thief becoming a police officer.
This is my personal opinion. It is a matter of course that even an elementary school student can understand his or her own opinions.
However, it’s difficult to tell if a person is a thief or not.
It would be nice to walk around with a headscarf over your head like a thief in a cartoon, but it doesn’t work that way in practice.
Therefore, when hiring a police officer, they thoroughly check whether he or she has a criminal record, such as theft, as one of the factors used to determine whether he or she will be accepted.
This is not limited to police officers, and even private companies should scrutinize their employees from every angle to determine if they are suitable for the position.
However, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (Hello Work) and many human rights organizations have not been able to determine whether the person is a thief or not.
They say that you should not check whether a person is a good fit for the company or not. The reason for this is that it may lead to discrimination.
I can’t figure out how this theory works for me.
