今週月曜日夕方、得意満面で営業マンが帰ってきた、「社長新規のお客様から仕事が貰えました・・」、「ホームランか・・、
クリーンヒットか・・」、「ホームランとまではいかんと思いますが２類打くらいにはなるのでは・・」、「そうか、何れにしても良くやった・・
」、

早速、調査部に依頼書をまわし実調に入る。依頼内容は、「今年５月に役員紹介で営業社員を一人採用したがちょっと気になる所がある。
普通は入社前に簡単な採用調査はしているが、今回は役員の紹介という事でもあり、履歴も面接態度も中々であったので、
即戦力としてNOチエックで採用した。ところが少し・・・」とのこと。

被調査人（４３歳）申告の履歴確認から調査に着手。大卒で１５年勤務したという中堅企業は、経歴確認に気軽く応じてくれたが、
実際の勤務は５年弱で、１５年勤続など全くのデタラメ。従って職務経歴書も嘘ばかり。次に勤めた会社では取締役に就任していたが、
金銭絡みの不祥事で解任。次の勤務先は、「本人の申し出以外は個人情報ですので何もお応えできません」と木で鼻を括ったような返事。
最終の勤務先は、「情報漏えいで現在裁判中」とのこと。よくよく話を聞いてみると、ライバル企業に情報を流しお金にしていたようである。

何れにしてもとんでもない人である。ところが現職場で何か具体的な不祥事や背任行為があった訳ではない、ただ何となく気になる・・・
というだけ。履歴詐称ではあるが、それだけで解雇できるかどうか・・・かなり難しい。

調査結果を聞いてフッと浮かんだのが、依頼企業の人事担当者の頭を抱える姿である。

企業が一端人を採用してしまうと辞めさせるのは大変である。ところが、厚生労働省や一部人権論者は、採用調査、
雇用調査は差別につながるおそれがあるかなダメだという。企業は個人情報保護法を盾に退職者の履歴確認にも応じない所が増えている。
嘆かわしいとしか言いようがない、もう少しグローバルに物事を考え、個人の利益のみに固守せず社会全般の事も少しは考えて欲しいものです。

On Monday evening this week, the salesman came back with a triumphant look on his face, “Mr. President, I got a job from a new customer…”, “A home run…,
A clean hit…”, “I don’t think it’s going to be a home run, but it’s going to be a second-class hit…”, “Oh, well, you did a good job anyway.
‘,

I immediately handed over the request to the investigation department and started the actual investigation. The content of the request was: “I hired a salesperson in May of this year for the introduction of a board member, but there was something that bothered me.
Normally, a simple hiring survey is done before joining the company, but this time it was an introduction of the director, and the history and interview attitude were good.
He was hired by NO CHEC as an immediate asset. However, it’s a little…

We started the investigation by checking the history of the respondent’s (43 years old) tax return. The mid-sized company, a college graduate who had worked there for 15 years, responded casually to my background check, but
I’ve only been with the company for a little less than 5 years and 15 years is complete bullshit. Therefore, the resume is also full of lies. At the next company I worked for, I was on the board of directors, but
Dismissed for money-related scandals. The next company I worked for replied, “We can’t respond to anything other than your request because it’s personal information,” as if they were holding their noses together with a tree.
His last employer was “currently on trial for information leaks”. On closer examination, it seems that he had been passing on information to rival companies to make money.

In any case, he is an outrageous person. However, there is no specific scandal or breach of trust in my current workplace, but I am somehow concerned about it…
It’s just that. I don’t know if I can fire you for that alone, although it’s history fraud…it’s pretty hard.

When I heard the results of the survey, I couldn’t help but think of the human resources staff of the client company.

Once a company has hired one end of a person, it’s hard to get them to quit. However, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and some human rights theorists have said that the hiring survey and
They say that employment surveys may or may not lead to discrimination. More and more companies are refusing to check the history of retirees, using the Personal Information Protection Law as a shield.
I can only describe it as deplorable, I wish they would think about things a little more globally and think about the society in general instead of just sticking to their personal interests.

求人誌での営業マン中採募集に応募があった。年齢４３歳、工業大学卒、大手建設会社及び住宅販売会社での職歴が３社。
面接での印象は良。言動はハキハキとしており労働意欲も十分に感じられ、面接官も「これはひろい者か・・」と思ったという。

そこで、経歴及び前職での勤怠、職務能力、退職理由などを確認する、採用調査を当社に依頼してきた。

営業から統括を経て昨日朝１番に調査員にその調査案件が配布された。調査員は、早速履歴の確認調査に着手したが、
あにはからんや調査は全く進まない。先ず、大学の卒業確認を試みたが、該当なし（大学は確認に応じてくれないが、
大学の卒業者名簿が保管されており、名簿にて確認する）。
大学新卒で就職し１３年勤めたとある大手建設会社は個人情報保護を理由に職歴確認に応じてくれない。２社目の職歴、
大手住宅販売会社に確認を試みる。直接人事を訪問しても同様の理由で多分応じてくれない。そこで、
職務経歴書から読み取れる直接の所属営業所及び同部署を管轄する営業関係部署で確認に努める事とし、
かなりの時間を費やすが全く確認できない。５年間勤め２年前に退職した先である。１０年も経過しておれば未だしも僅か２年前のこと、
古参社員は「私はこの部署に１０年居るが全く記憶にない。２?３ケ月の短期であれば自信はないが５年となるとチョット・・」との返答。
最終３社目の中堅住宅販売会社も今ひとつハッキリしない。何時もの調子で簡単に引き受けた仕事であるが、
担当調査員は頭を抱えて調査部長に相談、「部長、この人サッパリ判りません・・、何か方法有りませんでしょうか・・」。うーん・・
部長も頭をかかえるが、何か云わなければ格好も付かない。「現住所行ってみたんか・・」、　「いえ、居住地調査は別案件になりますので」、
「しかし、判らん場合は居住地が基本や、、。とにかく行ってこい」。早速、調査員は淀川区の申告住所地に向かった。履歴書には妻あり、
扶養家族蘭には２人と記録されているにもかかわらず、居住地はワンルームマンション。近所付き合いは全くなく、判ったのは、
家賃７万円で１年ほど前からの単身住まいというのみ。

この時点で、「履歴詐称の訳あり人物の可能性大」と判断されるが、確たる証拠はない。頭をかかえた調査員、再度部長に相談。
そこで部長、「社長この案件、少し費用かかりますがトコトンやりますよ・・」とひと声かけてきた。勿論OK。

結果はなんと業務上横領（横領金額８６０万円）で昨年１２月に逮捕されていた事が判明。履歴は全くのデタラメで住宅販売会社ではなく、
某大手スーパーに勤務していた人であった。無論妻子など居なく独身である。

どうして判ったのか・・。それは秘密です。但し、１００％警察などからの情報入手ではなく違法調査でもない。

ただ、たまたま今回のケースは上手く判ったが、必ず判るかと云われれば自信はない。今後ますます個人情報入手は難しくなるが、
その分アクがはびこる事になるのは間違いない。保証できる。

人権、プライバシーを護る為に、もっともっと大きな人権が侵害される結果になる可能性がある事を知って欲しい。

I received an application for a salesman recruitment in a job magazine. He is 43 years old, graduated from a technical college, and has worked for three major construction companies and a home sales company.
My impression of the interview was good. His speech was clear and his work ethic was sufficiently evident that the interviewer thought he was a broad-minded person.

Therefore, they asked us to conduct a hiring survey to verify their background, previous job performance, job skills, and reasons for leaving the company.

The case was handed out to the investigators first thing in the morning yesterday. The investigators immediately started to check the history, but
There is no progress at all in the Aniakaranya investigation. First of all, I tried to confirm the graduation of the university, but it didn’t apply (although the university didn’t respond to the confirmation).
(A list of university graduates is kept and confirmed in the list).
I worked for a major construction company for 13 years after graduating from university, and the company refused to check my work history due to the protection of my personal information.
Attempt to check with a major home sales company. A direct HR visit probably won’t comply for the same reason. So.
It can be read from the resume directly at the sales office to which you belong and the sales-related department that has jurisdiction over the department.
I spend a lot of time there, but I can’t identify it at all… it’s the place where I worked for five years and retired two years ago… after ten years, it was only two years ago.
The old employee replied, “I’ve been in this department for 10 years and I don’t remember anything about it… I’m not sure if it’s just for a few months, but 5 years is a little bit…
The third and final mid-sized home sales company is also not very clear. It was a job I took on easily as usual, but
The investigator in charge held his head and consulted the research manager, “Sir, I don’t understand this person at all …, is there any way to …? Hmm…
The manager was puzzled, but he had to say something or he wouldn’t look good. Did you go to his current address? – No, the residence check is a separate matter.
But if you don’t know, it’s based on where you live… Anyway, go and do it. Immediately, the investigators went to the declared address in Yodogawa Ward. I have a wife on my resume.
The residence is a one-room apartment, even though it is recorded as two in the Dependent Ran. I don’t have any neighbors at all, as far as I can tell.
The rent is 70,000 yen, and I’ve been living alone for about a year.

At this point in time, it is judged that there is a “great potential for a person with a history of history falsification,” but there is no hard evidence. The bewildered investigator consulted with the department manager again.
Then he said to me, “Mr. President, this project will cost you a little bit, but we’ll give it our all. Of course it’s OK.

It turns out that he was arrested last December for business embezzlement (embezzlement amount of 8.6 million yen). His history is complete bullshit, not a home sales company.
He was a person who worked at a major supermarket. Of course, he has no wife and children and is single.

How did you know…? It’s a secret. However, this is not 100% information from the police, and it is not an illegal investigation.

However, I just happened to find out about this case, but I’m not sure if I will. Although it will become increasingly difficult to obtain personal information, the
There is no doubt that this will result in a lot of scum. I can guarantee it.

I want you to know that the protection of human rights and privacy can result in greater human rights being violated.