振込み詐欺が騒がれだして何年に成るのだろう。当初は、こんな子供だましのような詐欺・・直ぐに捕まり、消えていくであろうくらいに思っていた。ところがところが、次から次から、新たな手口を編み出し、被害額は増える一方。留まるところを知らず、日本の警察力では対処出来ないまでに、振り込み詐欺は進化している。

この振込み詐欺を真似てか、弊社の採用調査で、新たな横領が発覚した。

採用調査で横領犯が発覚するのは、日常茶飯事とまでは云わないが、そんなに珍しい事ではない。それも、計画的なのもあれば、つい手を出してしまったなど色々で有るが、全て単独犯である。ところが、今回発覚したのは、何と集団である。

手口は、振込み詐欺と同じく極々単純なもの。会社の同僚３人が共謀して架空の会社を立ち上げ、銀行口座を開設し、そこに売上金を一端振り込ませ、その後、本来の会社にまともな金額を振り込むというもの。所謂、迂回振込みである。この間の細工は色々有るが、最近はネット振込みが一般化しており、名義を変えての振込みなど、何の問題も無い。完全に営業と経理が分離しており、システム化されている企業であれば難しさもあろうが、中小企業で、そこらがケースバイケースで行われているようなところであれば、その細工は意外と簡単かも・・・。

How many years has it been since the bank transfer scam started to make a fuss? At first, I thought that such a childish scam would be caught immediately and would disappear. However, one after another, new tricks are devised, and the amount of damage continues to increase. The bank transfer scam has evolved to the point that it is nowhere to be found and cannot be dealt with by the Japanese police force.

In a mockery of this transfer scam, a new embezzlement was uncovered in our recruitment investigation.

I wouldn’t say that embezzlement is an everyday occurrence, but it’s not that uncommon. Some of them were planned, some of them were intentional, some of them were out of control, but all of them were lone criminals. This time, however, it was a group of people who came to light.

The modus operandi is quite simple, as is the bank transfer scam. Three colleagues of the company conspired to set up a fictitious company, open a bank account, have the sales money transferred to the bank account, and then transfer a decent amount of money to the original company. This is what is called a roundabout transfer. There are various kinds of tricks, but recently net transfer has become generalized, and there is no problem such as transfer by changing the name. If it is a company where sales and accounting are completely separated and systematized, it may be difficult, but if it is a small and medium-sized company and the place where it is done on a case-by-case basis, the crafting may be surprisingly easy…

　くどい様ですが、またまた履歴書詐称の話。

　過去２回、当ブログに登場した、詐欺師同然の見事な履歴書詐称をする人の話です。実はこの人の調査依頼が、また・また・またあったのです。

　このブログを時々覗いてくれているお方はもしかしたら記憶にあるかと思いますが、「東京の開成高校から東大法学部を卒業し、通産省にキャリア採用されると同時に、ハーバード大学大学院に国費留学し、法科大学院を修了して帰国。以後、一流企業を渡り歩き、現在は外務省の特別通訳をしている」という人のことです。

　この人の調査依頼が最初にあったのが５～６年前だったと思う。

　調査結果は学歴職歴、全て嘘で、実際は高卒で４０歳余の今も独身で親の脛をかじっている甘ちゃんであった。

　実は、この人物の調査依頼が、別の企業から２～３年前に再度あった。その時の履歴書も、やはり学歴は同じ東大からハーバード大学であった。職歴は一部違っていたが、最終の勤務先は実際に部長職で勤めていた。ところが、入社３ケ月頃からボロガ出はじめ、不審を持った上司がバックグランドチェックをしたところ、履歴が全くデタラメである事が発覚。ところが事は既に遅しで、本人は数百万円の横領を働いており、クビにしたと云うこと（調査結果）であった。

　この人物の調査依頼が、最近またまた有った。ところが今回は以前に詐称していた学歴や職歴とは全く違い、今回は、在阪の高校からアメリカのワシントン州立大学に学び、以後一流企業を２．３変わり、現在は経営コンサルタントをしているというものであった。

　同じ人物でありながら、履歴は全く違い、同じなのは氏名、生年月日、現住所だけ。

　全くもってであるが、世の中にはこんな人も居るのである。

　しかも、こうした人が大手を振って王道を歩けるのが今の日本である。実は、今回の調査でも、新たな最後の勤務先では部長職で採用されていた（３ケ月で解雇になったが）。

ここで私が云いたいのは、今の個人情報保護の流れと、厚労省が行う行政指導（採用時の身元調査はしてはならない）です。

　事実は小説より奇なりで、こうした履歴詐称を繰り返し、企業にキャリア採用され、横領などの不正行為を働きながら大手を振って生きていける、援助、保護をしているのが厚労省の指導であり、個人情報保護の流れの弊害があるという事です。

　バックグランドチェックを専門に行う弊社の調査員が苦労に苦労を重ねても、今の個人情報保護の壁を乗り越えて、履歴確認を行うのは中々ではないのが現状です。ましてや、面接やペーパー試験だけで、履歴詐称を見抜くのは至難の業でしょう。にも関わらず、行政も企業も第三者の履歴確認には協力しない（自分のところは何とかして確認してくれと云うが）。このような履歴書詐称を助長させるような社会風潮で良いのでしょうか・・・。個人情報保護法の目的を履き違えないで、運用面も確りと考えて頂きたいものだ。

　微力ではありますが、今年もこんな事をつぶやきながら、一隅を照らして行けたらと思っております。

I don’t mean to be rude, but I’m talking about resume fraud again.

It’s the story of a brilliant resume scammer who has appeared on this blog two times in the past. As a matter of fact, I was asked to investigate this person again, and again, and again.

As those of you who have been following this blog from time to time may remember, he graduated from Kaisei High School in Tokyo with a degree in law from the University of Tokyo and was hired by the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) for his career, while at the same time studying at Harvard University on a government-sponsored scholarship and completing law school before returning to Japan. Since then, he has moved through top-tier companies and is now a special interpreter for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

I think it was five or six years ago when I first got the request to investigate this person.

The results of the survey were all lies about his education and work history, and in fact, he was a high school graduate who is still single at the age of 40 and is still chewing on his parents’ shins.

In fact, another company had asked me to investigate this person again a couple of years ago. My resume at that time also had the same educational background from the University of Tokyo to Harvard University. My work history was partly different, but my last place of employment was actually in a department head position. However, around three months after joining the company, he began to get raggedy, and when his suspicious boss did a background check, he found out that his resume was completely untrue. However, it was already too late, he had embezzled several millions of yen and had been fired (according to the results of the investigation).

I’ve been asked to investigate this person again recently. This time, however, it was completely different from the academic and work history that he had previously misrepresented; this time, he said that he had studied at Washington State University in the U.S. from a high school in Osaka, and had since changed a couple of top-tier companies and was now a management consultant.

It is the same person, but the history is completely different, only the name, date of birth and current address are the same.

It’s a shame, but there are people like this in the world.

What’s more, these people are able to take the royal road in today’s Japan. As a matter of fact, even in this investigation, at the new and last place of employment, he was employed in the position of department manager (although he was laid off after three months).

What I’m talking about here is the current flow of personal information protection and administrative guidance from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (no background checks at the time of hiring).

The facts are stranger than fiction, and it is the guidance of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare that these people who repeatedly falsify their histories, get hired by companies, embezzle and other malfeasance, and make a living at the top of their game, which is the harm of the flow of personal information protection.

Even though our investigators, who specialize in background checks, have gone through a lot of hard work, it’s still not easy to overcome the current barrier of protecting personal information and perform a history check. In fact, it would be very difficult to spot a fraudulent resume based on interviews and paper exams alone. In spite of this, neither the government nor the company is willing to cooperate with a third party to check the history of the company (although I am told that my company has to check it somehow). Is it a social trend that encourages this kind of resume fraud? It is important that the purpose of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information is not misunderstood, and the operation of the Act should be carefully considered.

Although it’s only a little, I would like to light up a corner of the world by tweeting such things this year.

個人情報保護が施行された当初に、有識者から匿名社会の到来を危惧する声が多く聞かれたが、最近その現象が如実に現れている。

弊社の様な、人事調査をメインとしている社は、何処に限らず、その現実をイヤというほど思い知らされていると思うが、今日もエッと思わされる報告書を目にした。

小生の日課（仕事）のひとつに、調査員が書いたレポートに眼を通すというのがある。今日もそんなことで、お盆ではあるが、出社してレポートチェックをしていた。

その中の１件のレポートに驚かされた。

特殊なレポートではない。極普通の採用調査のレポート。

所見は、採用不適当。　所見の根拠・・。履歴書の姓名が本当かどうか判断できない。理由は、自分の名前を３つも４つも使い分けて、詐欺及び詐欺未遂を繰り返しており、自分で自分の名前がよく判らないのではと思えるくらい、都度名前を変えている人である事が判明したもの。

今回の就職応募では、詐欺云々の臭いはしないが、「採用不適当」と判断せざるを得ない人、と判定されたものであった。

When personal data protection was first enacted, many pundits voiced concerns about the arrival of an anonymous society.

I’m sure that companies like ours that mainly conduct HR research, regardless of where they are located, have been reminded of this reality as much as possible, and today I saw a report that made me angry.

One of my daily tasks is to look over the reports written by the investigators. That’s why I went to work today to check the report, even though it’s Obon.

I was surprised by the report on one of them.

It’s not a special report. Ultra-ordinary recruitment survey report.

The findings are unsuitable for adoption.　The basis for the findings… I can’t determine if the last name on the resume is real or not. The reason turned out to be that he is a person who uses three or four of his own names, repeats frauds and attempted frauds, and changes his name each time so that it seems that he doesn’t know his own name well.

This time, my job application did not reek of fraud, but was judged to be “unsuitable” for employment.

弊社の仕事は採用調査がメイン。それも有職者、所謂、中途採用のバックグランドチェックが主体となっている。過去何回かこのブログでも紹介したが、履歴書というのは、本人自ら自分の経歴を記載するのだから、一般的には間違いないものとされている。ところがところが、この仕事をして分かったことだが、何と履歴書に嘘の多いこと。何時からこんな社会に成ったのだろうか・・・。個人情報保護＝匿名社会＝不正社会＝犯罪社会の図式が頭をよぎるのは小生だけであろうか。また、プライバシーや個人情報が保護されれば、本当に暮らしやすい社会に成るのだろうか・・・。凡人はついついこんな事を考えてしまう。

本当は、今日はこんなボヤキを書くつもりではなかった。ただ、書き出すとついつい何時ものボヤキになってしまう・・・反省。

書きたかったのは以下のこと。

最近の小生の主な仕事は、調査員が書いたレポートの点検。所謂、新聞社等でつかわれる「デスク」と呼ばれるポジションの仕事である。

一日何十件のレポートに目を通すが、内容は千差万別。良い人もいればとんでもない人もいる。その内の一件

氏名、山田太郎（仮名／２７歳）

平成２２年３月　○○大学　卒業

平成２２年４月　○○㈱　入社

平成２８年２月　○○㈱　退職

平成２８年５月　△△㈱　入社

平成２９年２月　△△㈱　退職

（調査報告書）

所見、　「申告の履歴書は全くのデタラメ。前々職の○○㈱は、約６年間の在職となっているが、実際は５年ほど前に６ケ月勤務しただけ。しかもまともに出勤したのは入社後２ケ月程で、後は家庭事情（父が心筋梗塞で倒れたとか、病院に連れて行くため、等々の理由で）を理由に度々欠勤していた。余りに欠勤が多いため、会社の人が家庭訪問をすると、父親は心筋梗塞どころかピンピンしていた元気な姿で応対したという。そんな事から会社は本人と話し合いの場を持ち、結果勧奨退職なったとのこと。尚、前職の△△㈱は、在職期間は僅か５ケ月。しかも、父親が急死したとの理由で、特別休暇をとり、そのまま退職したとの事であった。ところが、父親は元気で今も勤めに出かける姿が近隣者に確認されており、父親の死は全くの虚言であることが判明した。以上、申告履歴に信憑性は無く、空白期間の動向も定かで無く、被調査人は虚言癖のある信頼しがたい人物と判断せざるを得ない」

尚、レポートの記事欄には、前職、前々職での勤怠状況などが細々と書かれ、上記の所見を裏付けるものと成っている。

これに類するレポートは日常茶飯事に目にする。ところが、これは調査員の努力の賜物であり、普通に正面から前職照会をかければ、「個人情報ですからお応えできません。期間は勿論、居たか居なかったかもお応えする事はできません・・」と、けんもほろろに云われるのがおちである。これが今の個人情報保護の流れである。

※　但し、上記報告書の所見は、実際の報告書をそのまま転記したものではない。

our company The main part of the company’s work is recruitment research. It is also mainly a background check for employed people, so to speak, mid-career hires. As I’ve mentioned on this blog a few times in the past, a resume is generally considered to be accurate because it’s a personal statement of your background. However, what I found out after working here is that there are a lot of lies on resumes. I wonder when we became such a society… Am I the only one who thinks that personal information protection = anonymous society = fraudulent society = criminal society? Also, if privacy and personal information are protected, will it really make our society easier to live in? The average person can’t help but think about this.

Truth be told, I didn’t mean to write such a blurb today. However, when I write it out, it always becomes a blur…..

The following is what I wanted to write about

My main job these days is to check the reports written by the investigators. This is what is called a “desk” position in a newspaper company.

I read dozens of reports a day, but the content varies a thousand times. Some people are good, some are not so good. one of these

Name, Taro Yamada (pseudonym/ 27 years old)

March 2010 Graduated from ○○ University

April 2010 Entered XX Corporation

February 2018 ○○ Corporation Retirement

May 2018 Joined △△ Corporation

February 2017 Retirement

(Investigation Report)

Findings, “The filing resume is complete bullshit. The previous company, XX, has been in the company for about six years, but in reality, I only worked there for six months about five years ago. After that, he was absent for family reasons (my father had a heart attack, I had to take him to the hospital, etc.). He was so absent from work that when the company staff visited him at home, his father appeared to be in good spirits, not having a heart attack. As a result, the company had a discussion with him, and as a result, he resigned at the recommendation of the company. The previous company, △△△, had been in the company for only five months. Moreover, he had taken a special leave of absence and left the company as it was because his father had died suddenly. However, it turns out that his father’s death was a complete lie, as his neighbors confirmed that he was in good spirits and was still seen going to work. In light of the foregoing, the filing history is not credible, and the trends of the blank period are not certain, we are compelled to conclude that the respondent is an untrustworthy person with a habit of lying.

In addition, the article section of the report contains detailed information on the status of attendance at the previous and previous positions, which supports the above findings.

I see this kind of report on a daily basis. However, this is the result of the efforts of the investigators, and if you normally ask them about their previous jobs from the front, they will say, “We can’t respond to your inquiry because it is personal information. Of course, I can’t tell you whether or not I was there for a period of time,” he said with a whimper. This is the current trend in personal information protection.

However, the findings in the above report are not a transcription of the actual report.
*** Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) ***

履歴書って普通信用しますよね・・・。
自分の履歴を自分で書くのだから、やたら間違う訳もないし、履歴書に嘘を書くなんて普通は考え難い。従って、
普通の人は履歴書は頭から正しい物と信じている。

ところがどっこい、この就職難の時代。2・3年で転職を繰り返している人や、
前職で不都合を起こし退職又は解雇になったような人は、イザ履歴書を書こうと机に向かうと、
このまま正直書いたのではまずい、
との思いが頭をよぎる？。そこで、ついつい不祥事のあった会社を隠したり、１・２年の短期で辞めた会社を抜かし、2・
3社を１社にまとめて申告し、辻褄を合わせると云う事になる。

こうした履歴の相違は、弊社で扱う中途採用調査（経歴確認、履歴確認）全体で３０％内外を占めている。
これは弊社に限ったことではないと思うが、日本ではこの手の調査に否定的見解を取る省庁があり、
統計的数字は発表されていないが、アメリカの場合、大手調査会社の統計によると、
ほぼ同じく３０％の履歴詐称が認められると云う。

従って、経歴詐称など、
調査員から見ると日常茶飯事で、取り立てて騒ぐほどの事でなく、「申告では○○と成っているが正しくは○○で、
経歴の相違が認められる。但し、勤怠は悪くなく、上司の指示には素直に従い勤勉真面目に勤め、同僚とも上手く折り合っていた。
退職についても不都合事由はなく、キャリアアップを目指し転職を決意したもので、特に懸念されるものは認められない」
等と、報告書（レポート）をまとめている。中には、「未申告の職歴、○○会社では、
金銭の使い込みが発覚し懲戒解雇となった事実があり、それを隠すために○○会社は申告しなかったものと思料される」
等の報告となる。しかし、こうしたケースは理解の範疇で、ごくごく普通のことである。

ところが最近、経歴詐称（履歴書詐称）
をごく普通の事ととらえている調査員が、ウッと唸るような、巧妙と云うか何と云うか、
非常に狡猾な詐称が増えてきており、小生が３年前、戸籍法改正に猛反対し、詐欺師天国日本の到来を予見し警笛を鳴らしていたが、
どうもそれが現実のものとなりつつ有るように思う。

一般に即戦力を求める求人企業は、最近は民間の職業紹介所（有料職業紹介所）
を通じ採用するのが一般的となっているが、この職業紹介所は厚労省の許可事業であり、厚労省の指導を絶対的のものとしている。その為、
求職者（登録者）
の経歴確認などは先ず行っていない。それを知ってか知らずか、キャリアクラスの求職者の中に、
思ってもみないような履歴詐称があり、しかも、履歴を証明する在籍証明書の偽造を行うワルが増えてきている。
以前にもこのブログで具体的事例を紹介したことがあるが、最近経験したのは、弊社の調査で
「被調査人○○は某企業には勤めた形跡がなく、従って、職務経歴書も全て作文と思料される」
とした報告に、依頼企業が被調査人を呼び出し、再確認したところ、「在籍証明書」を持参し、
「この通り間違いありません・・・」と申し出たものである。当然依頼企業はカンカンである。
弊社の営業も「申し訳ありません、直ぐに再確認を・・
」と平身低頭。早速調査員に再調査を指示、調査員は「そんな馬鹿な・・・」、
ブツブツ言いながら再調査に入る。結果、「在籍証明書」
が偽造されたものである事が発覚し、事なきを得たが、それこそ、くわばらくわばらであった。

このケースは、たまたま運よく偽造が判ったが、今の個人情報保護法の流れ、厚労省の指導
（採用時の調査は差別につながるおそれがあるのでしない様に・・・）の流れからすると、大手を振って経歴詐称（履歴詐称）
がまかり通ることになるでしょう。イヤ、既になっており、経歴を立派に偽った人が採用され、
馬鹿正直に本当の経歴を申告した人が不採用になる、不公平な選考が行なわれている可能性が大いにあるのです。

正直、今の流れからすると、弊社のような調査会社が採用前調査に関わらない限り、求人企業が経歴詐称を見破るのは不可能に近いのでは無いかと思われます。
特に、キャリアクラスの採用で、何らかの意図を持って履歴を作文し、潜り込もうとするようなケースは先ず見破れないでしょう。だって、
住民票も卒業証明書も在籍証明書も全て本人以外は入手不可能で、第三者の問い合わせには「個人情報保護」を盾に絶対応じない。ところが、
その気になれば住民票や各種証明書などは簡単に偽造できるのですから・・・。

　此処で私が云いたいのは、正当な理由があれば第三者でも「個人情報」を確認できるシステムにしておかなければ、犯罪の事前回避が出来なくなると云う事です。

　調査会社の仕事は大半がリスクマネジメントであり、事前調査で如何にリスクを回避するかですが、
その為に個人情報を取ろうとすると、因果関係を示す「そめい資料」の添付を要求される。ところが事前調査段階では、
因果関係を示す資料など存在しないのが普通です。だって、契約前の与信調査や入社前の経歴調査であり、
契約や入社した後の調査では大体が後の祭りになってしまうのですから。履歴書が手許にあり、
その経歴が間違いかどうか位は確認できないとおかしいでしょう。ところが、官公庁も大手企業も個人情報を盾に全く応じないのが今の現状です。
厚労省などは調査そのものを否定しようとしているのですから・・・。

We usually trust resumes…right?
You’re writing your own resume, so there’s no reason to make any mistakes, and it’s hard to think about lying on your resume. Therefore, the
Most people believe that a resume is the right thing from the get-go.

However, in this era of job-hunting difficulties, there are some people who repeatedly change jobs after 2 or 3 years, and others who are not able to find a job.
If you’ve been fired or resigned due to some inconvenience in your previous job, when you turn to your desk to write your resume, you’ll find that you’re not the only one.
It’s not a good time to be honest with you.
The thought rears its ugly head. Therefore, they tend to hide the companies that had scandals, overtake the companies that left after only a short period of one or two years, and then go on to the second or third year.
The three companies will be reported as one, and the results will be consistent.

This discrepancy in history accounts for 30% or more of our mid-career hiring surveys (background checks and resume checks) as a whole.
This is not limited to our company, but in Japan, there are ministries and agencies that take a negative view of this kind of investigation.
No statistical figures have been released, but in the case of the United States, according to statistics from a major research firm
Almost as many as 30 percent of the time, they’ll admit to history theft.

Therefore, there is no such thing as background falsification.
From an investigator’s point of view, it’s an everyday occurrence, not something to make a fuss about.
There is an admitted difference in background. However, her work ethic was not bad, she obeyed her supervisor’s instructions diligently and diligently, and she got along well with her colleagues.
There are no inconsiderable grounds for resignation, and there is nothing of particular concern because he has decided to change jobs to advance his career.
The report (report) is summarized as follows. Some of them say, “Undeclared work experience, at a certain company, is not a good thing.
It is assumed that there was a fact that the company was dismissed on disciplinary grounds after it was discovered that it had spent money, and that the company did not report it in order to hide it.
This is a report of the following. However, these cases are within the realm of understanding and are quite common.

Recently, however, there has been a case of “career falsification” (resume falsification)
It’s the kind of thing that makes an investigator, who takes it as an ordinary thing, ooh and aah.
I was fiercely opposed to the amendment of the Family Registration Law three years ago, foreseeing the coming of Japan as a paradise for frauds and sounding the alarm, but the number of very cunning frauds is on the rise.
It seems to me that it is becoming a reality.

In general, companies looking for immediate employment are now using private placement agencies (paid placement agencies).
However, this employment agency is a business licensed by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and the guidance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is absolute. For this reason.
Job seekers (registrants)
The company did not conduct a background check on Knowingly or unknowingly, one of the job seekers in my career class is
There’s a lot of history fraud that you wouldn’t expect, and more and more badasses are forging proof of enrollment to prove their history.
I’ve given specific examples on this blog before, but I recently experienced that in our research
There is no indication that the investigator ________ ever worked for a certain company, so it is assumed that his resume is an essay.
The client company summoned the respondent and reconfirmed that he had brought a “certificate of enrollment” and that he was a member of the
I’m sure this is true…” he offered. Naturally, the client company is upset.
Our sales staff also said, “I’m sorry, we’re going to have to recheck…
He said with a flat head. He immediately instructed the investigator to re-examine the case, and the investigator said, “That’s ridiculous…
He mumbles and starts to investigate again. The result is a “certificate of enrollment.
was found to be a forgery, but it was only a forgery.

In this case, the forgery was found by chance, but the current flow of the Personal Information Protection Law and the guidance of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
If you’re not sure if you’re going to be able to get a job, you’re going to be able to get a job.
will come to pass. No, they’re already there, and they’re hiring people with respectable false resumes.
There is a great possibility that there is an unfair selection process in which people who honestly declare their real background are rejected.

To be honest, the way things are going right now, unless a research firm like ours is involved in a pre-employment investigation, it’s going to be nearly impossible for a recruiter to spot background fraud.
Especially in career class hires, you won’t be able to spot a case where someone is trying to write a resume and dive in with some kind of intent. Because…
The residence certificate, graduation certificate, and enrollment certificate are all unavailable to anyone other than the person himself, and he never responds to inquiries from third parties on the grounds of “personal information protection”. However.
If you are so inclined, you can easily forge a certificate of residence or various certificates…

What I’m saying here is that if we don’t have a system that allows a third party to verify “personal information” with a valid reason, it will be impossible to avoid a crime in advance.

Most of the work of a research company is about risk management and how to avoid risks by conducting preliminary research.
If you try to take personal information for this purpose, you will be asked to attach “background information” to show the causal relationship. However, in the preliminary investigation phase, the
There is usually no such thing as a causal relationship. I mean, it’s a pre-contract credit check, pre-hiring background check.
This is because most of the time it’s an afterthought in contracts and post-employment investigations. I have my resume in hand.
It would be ridiculous not to be able to at least check whether the background is a mistake or not. However, the current situation is that neither the government nor the major corporations are willing to comply with this policy using personal information as a shield.
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is trying to deny the investigation itself….