毎週一回はブログを更新しようと思っている。ところが最近は気が付くと早や２週間何もしていない、なんてことがザラにある。
今回もそう。ところが直ぐに話題が浮かばない。そこで昔はどんな事を書いていたのか？と10年ほど前のブログを覗くと、たまたま興味深い記事（２００７年６月のブログ）が出てきた。
これは再度読んで頂けたら、特に行政官になどと思い、下記に添付することにした。
学歴詐称。
大阪市は、職員９６５名を学歴詐称で停職１カ月の処分にしたという。
関市長は市民に申し訳ないと陳謝しながら、「こんなに学歴詐称が多くあったなんて・・」
と驚きを隠さない。今頃何を言っているのですか・・、と言いたい。
ここで一寸考えて頂きたい。本来採用されるべきでない人、所謂、採用条件にみたない人が虚偽の申告（履歴詐称）
をして採用された訳である。と云うことは、同じ数だけ、本来採用されてしかるべき人が、虚偽申告の人の為に不採用となった訳である。
学歴を詐称していたと云うことは当然職歴も詐称しているはず。そうしないと履歴の辻褄が合わなくなるから。と云うことは、面接時の応答も、其れ相応につくり話をしないと上手くいかない。嘘を嘘で塗り固めて採用され、正直者は不採用になったと言う訳。
国も府も市も、従来から採用時の調査には極めて否定的である。「採用調査は差別につながるおそれがあるから」と云うのがその理由である。その結果が、今回明るみになった大阪市の大量学歴詐称問題である。採用調査は差別につながる云々で、結果的に大阪市は大変な差別採用をしていたのである。不採用になった人にこの事をどう説明するつもりであろうか・・・。
以前、大阪府と市が主体となって、「公正採用調査システム検討会議」と云うのが約１年かけて行われた。その会議の委員として、当時業界を代表して私も出席させてもらった。委員のメンバーは、有識者と言われる大学教授や弁護士の外、行政、経済団体、人権団体、労働組合の代表者など１０数名であった。
検討会議は、その直前に起きた差別調査事件を受けて設けられたものであり、調査業界にとっては極めて厳しい状況にあった。
そんな中で私が必死になって主張したのは、この事であった。少なくとも「公正採用」をさけぶのであれば、応募者の履歴や職務経歴書が正しいか否かを調べ、正しい履歴や職務経歴に基づいて判断しなければ公正さを欠く」と。虚偽の履歴がまかり通るのはおかしい、と声を大にして主張した。ところが、えらい先生方には中々理解して貰えなかった。
調査することによって人権、プライバシーが侵されることは確かにあると思うが、調査しなかった為に人権、プライバシーが侵されることもある。「公正採用の為には調査は必要不可欠なものである」と思うが如何でしょうか。
９６５名の学歴詐称職員はそれでも１か月の停職でこれからも勤める事ができる。しかし、採用されなかった者は一日たりとて勤める事は出来ない。
正しい履歴に基づいて公正な判断がなされていれば採用されていたかもしれない多くの応募者のことを思うとき、怒りを覚えずにはいられない。
I will try to update my blog at least once a week. Recently, however, I’ve been finding that I haven’t done anything for two weeks.
This time too. However, the topic did not come up immediately. What did they write about in the old days there? When I peeked at a blog from about 10 years ago, an interesting article came up by chance (June 2007 blog).
I thought it would be nice if you could read it again, especially to government officials, etc., so I’ve attached it below.
False education.
The city of Osaka has suspended 965 employees for one month for falsifying their school records.
Mayor Seki apologized to the public, but said, “I had no idea there were so many cases of academic fraud…
He was surprised to see it. I’d like to say, “What are you talking about now…?
I want you to think about this for a moment. A person who should not have been hired, so to speak, who does not meet the requirements for employment, makes a false declaration (resume falsification)
The reason for this is that it was adopted by the This means that the same number of people who should have been hired were not hired because of the false declaration.
If he had falsified his education, he must have falsified his work history as well. Otherwise, the histories don’t add up. In other words, you have to make up your own story at the interview to make it work. They were hired by coating lies with lies, and the honest ones were rejected.
Both the State, the Prefecture and the City have traditionally been extremely negative about investigations at the time of hiring. The reason for this is that “hiring surveys can lead to discrimination. The result is that Osaka City has come to light this time on the issue of mass educational fraud. As a result, the city of Osaka was hiring in a very discriminatory manner, on the grounds that recruitment surveys lead to discrimination. I wonder how they are going to explain this to the people who were rejected….
In the past, the Osaka Prefecture and the city took the lead in holding a “Fair Employment Survey System Study Conference” for about a year. As a member of that conference, I was allowed to attend as a representative of the industry at the time. The committee consisted of more than a dozen members, including university professors and lawyers who are said to be intellectuals, as well as representatives of the government, economic groups, human rights groups, and labor unions.
The study council was established in response to the discrimination investigation case that had just occurred, and it was an extremely difficult situation for the investigation industry.
It was in this context that I desperately insisted on this. At the very least, if you’re going to shy away from ‘fair hiring,’ it’s not fair if you don’t examine the correctness of an applicant’s history and work history and make a decision based on the correct history and work history. He argued aloud that it was ridiculous that a false history could get away with it. However, I couldn’t get a lot of understanding from the great teachers.
It is true that human rights and privacy can be violated by an investigation, but it is also true that human rights and privacy can be violated because of a failure to investigate. How would you feel that “investigations are indispensable for fair recruitment?
The 965 school-recognition-frauding employees will still be able to continue to work after a month’s suspension. However, those who are not employed cannot work even for a day.
I can’t help but feel angry when I think of the many applicants who might have been hired if a fair decision had been made based on the correct history.
*** Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) ***
