履歴書詐称（経歴詐称）
危惧していたことが現実に。以前このブログにも書いたが、今の個人情報保護や人権の流れからすると「履歴書詐称」が蔓延し、東大や京大卒が倍増するのではないか・・？、
との警笛を鳴らしたが、徐々にその危惧が現実化しつつある。その事を実例をもって紹介したいと思う。
先般、クライアントの某企業から久し振りに電話、「一寸相談したいことがあるので来ていただけませんか」、「ハイ判りました。直ぐにお伺いします」。
担当の営業マンは喜び勇んで飛び出して行った。で、持ち帰った資料は可也の量。ひと目見るなり、履歴書５?６件はあるな・・・
と喜んだのも束の間、実際はさに非ず。たった１件の雇用調査であった。ただ単に調査の為の参考資料が多いだけ。
理由は、履歴書に添付された資料が通常の職務経歴書の外、
卒業証書の写し１通、卒業証明書の写し１通、在職証明書２通、資格の証明書２通、国家試験の一部合格証明書１通。
ご丁寧と云うか、お見事と云うか・・・、驚嘆に値するほどキチッとした履歴書と、その履歴を証明する添付資料であった。
此処までの資料を揃えての応募ゆえ、企業は経歴については「疑う余地なし」として、
採用調査を省略し面接だけで採用を決定。即戦力として、そこそこのポストを用意し就業して貰った。
ところが思った程に仕事は出来ない。会話の中にも時々アレッと思うようなところがある。
そこで、疑問に感じた人事担当者が、弊社に「一寸来ていただけませんか・・
」と、なった訳らしい。
早速その履歴と添付資料に基づいて経歴調査を開始。ところがご存知の通りで、
学校は個人情報を盾に卒業確認には応じない。企業は在職確認に応じない。お手上げである、ところがそこで手を上げたのでは調査に成らない。
調査員は何時もの通り、あの手この手で苦心惨憺。結果は、大学は２校ともウソ、職歴も全くのデタラメ。
何でその事実が判ったかと云うに、奴さんの提出した添付資料の書式や内容が本物と少しづつ違っていたため。こう云うのを一般に
「墓穴を掘る」と云う。
卒業証書は文面に若干の違いがあった。卒業証明書は学長名が違っていた（代の違う学長名）、在職証明書は書式に違いがあった。等などで、個人の事は云えないが自校、自社が発行したものか否か、
書式やその外の内容については個人情報とは別として、ご協力頂けたと云う訳である。
笑い話のような本当の話。 こんな世間に誰がした・・・・♪ 。
What I had feared came true. As I wrote on this blog before, from the current trend of personal information protection and human rights, “resume fraud” will become widespread and the number of graduates of Tokyo University and Kyoto University will double… and
But the fears are gradually becoming a reality. I would like to introduce this with an actual example.
The other day, a certain company of a client called me after a long time, “I have something I want to discuss with you, so can you come?” “Yes, I understand. We’ll be right back.
The salesman in charge flew out with joy. So, I brought back a considerable amount of materials. That’s five or six résumés on the face of it.
While I was glad to hear that, in fact, it wasn’t that bad. It was only one employment investigation. It’s just a lot of reference material for research.
The reason is that the material attached to the resume is outside of the normal work history and
One copy of your diploma, one copy of your graduation certificate, two certificates of employment, two certificates of qualification, and one certificate of partial acceptance of the national examination.
I can’t say that it was polite, but I can say that it was brilliant… I was amazed at the neatness of the resume and the attachments that proved it.
Since we have all the information we need, the company will assume that our background is “unquestionable”.
Hiring decisions are made based on interviews only, omitting the hiring survey. I prepared a decent post and asked them to work there as an immediate helper.
However, I can’t do as much work as I thought. There are parts of the conversation that I sometimes wonder about.
So, one of our HR staff members, who had some doubts, asked us if he could come to our company for a moment…
It seems that this is the reason why he was able to do so.
We started a background check based on the history and attachments. However, as you know.
Schools will not respond to graduation verifications using personal information as a shield. Companies do not respond to tenure checks. It’s too much to handle, but it’s not enough to investigate if you raise your hand there.
The investigators are, as always, going through a lot of pains and tribulations. The result is that both universities are lies and the work experience is complete bullshit.
The reason why I found out this fact is because the format and contents of the documents he submitted were slightly different from the real ones. You know, like this.
It’s called “digging a grave.
The diploma was slightly different in wording. The certificate of graduation had a different name for the president (a different name for the president), and the certificate of tenure had a different format. I can’t tell you about the individual, but I can tell you whether it’s issued by your school or your company or not.
The form and other details are not included in the personal information, but we thank you for your cooperation.
A hilariously true story. Who in the world has done this to me…
